Today is the first day of the 2020 Wyoming Blockchain Stampede and it kicks off with two days of exploring interim and upcoming legislation by the Select Committee on Blockchain, Financial Technology and Digital Innovation Technology. Wyoming’s Blockchain Task Force, through their diligence and genuine care, earned a transition to a select committee of the Wyoming Legislature.
Self-Sovereignty and Digital Identity: One of the two most interesting topics of the day was the report out of the Digital Identity Working Group. Sovereignty, as a word, is usually applied to countries or nations. When applied to an individual in the digital world “sovereign” carries some new-age weight. At its core, it means that I have an intangible digital representation through which I can act. It must be with purpose, attributable to my identity, and signed with my private keys. This isn’t a VeriSign transaction or scanning and sending back a signed PDF. This isn’t an avatar, handle, or moniker to use online. This is digital self. This is a huge leap forward and I applaud the committee members and their outside experts in working to create (again) cutting-edge legislation that understands where technology is taking us and anticipating tomorrow’s legal headaches.
Crowdfunding. ICOs, STOs, and beyond: The initial coin offering (ICO) craze provided some tough lessons for users in the crypto space. Some users thought they were buying a stake in the project like an IPO, but most of these coins proved to be utility tokens and simply gave users network access based upon their holdings. The emerging security token offerings (STO) seek to be compliant with securities laws and provide digital ownership of trade-able assets.
As a DIYer and this being a DIY site, the bill encompassing crowdfunding that the committee has voted to move on is extremely important. In securities there are two types of investors: accredited and non-accredited. Accredited investors are the “it takes money to make money” crowd and have at least $1M of net worth or two consecutive years of earnings over $200,000. Accredited investors can invest large sums in lucrative, non-registered investments. Non-accredited investors are most of the people I know, and non-accredited investors are capped at what they can invest. Why? No good reason.
No matter how much money an individual has, or doesn’t have, the government should not dictate how much of that money can be invested and where. Because I do not make as much money as an accredited investor doesn’t mean that I should be precluded from reaping as many rewards from my investments as possible. This is where the SEC and Satoshi’s vision collide the hardest for me.